Primary Navigation
Governance DNA
As if the difficulties of assessing a group are not enough there is the absence of a clear connection between that process and its results and the reasons for the continued existence of the organization behind the board. To be blunt, we need to understand a great more about the links between good governance and the ability of the organization to achieve its goals. Otherwise, the annual evaluation of the board and its directors is supportive but not conclusive; necessary but not sufficient.
Watch for the Red Lights
In "Mischief of Many Sorts" I offered the view that rules are all very well but they follow the dictum of necessary but not sufficient. I concluded that piece on the issue of ethics and asked the question: "How should directors prepare for the sins they know will be committed?" Sound, strongly held ethics are the best defense, and if we could only be sure that they will always be in operation this page would be unnecessary - but it is.
A dilemma for directors is the fact that ethical behaviour is not simple. Not only does one have to know the right [...] read more »As the Twig is Bent
Virgil said, “As the twig is bent so is the tree inclined”, just one of his many catchy phrases that achieved proverb status. Its essential wisdom has been the subject of everything from books to stage plays to human research, and I am borrowing it for the title of a few words on creating a company’s first board of directors.
This site is primarily for those involved in smaller organizations but the task of drafting a one-size-fits-all profile for the directors of emerging companies is as impossible as it is for any of the others. That said, there are ess [...] read more »Recent Contributor
Recent Posts
- Necessary - But Not Sufficient
4 weeks ago - In God We Trust
2 months ago - Can You Skate?
3 months ago - Watch for the Red Lights
4 months ago - Mischief of Many Sorts
5 months ago
Page Options
